Home > Uncategorized > How worse things can go?—–>CJP’s letter in response to the dictator’s allegations.

How worse things can go?—–>CJP’s letter in response to the dictator’s allegations.

 

How worse can things go?

Our CJ is forced to clear his position in the world because our so called President Dictator is maligning him all over the world.

 

BUT for CJP Sahab

 

“Sir you are giving justifications to the wrong people, they are the ones (especially Rice) who supported Musharraf’s actions from the back and its part of their ‘Do More’ policy.”

 

Keep Your spirits high , Allah will help you and us.

 
*AN OPEN LETTER TO:*
 
 
 
His Excellency
 
The President of the European Parliament,
 
Brussels.
 
 
 
His Excellency
 
The President of France,
 
Paris.
 
 
 
His Excellency
 
The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom,
 
London.
 
 
 
Her Excellency
 
Ms. Condaleeza Rice,
 
Secretary of State,
 
United States of America,
 
Washington D.C.
 
 
 
Professor Klaus Schwab,
 
World Economic Forum,
 
Geneva.
 
 
 
All through their respective Ambassodors, High Commissioners and
representatives.
 
 
 
 
 
Excellency,
 
 
 
I am the Chief Justice of Pakistan presently detained in my residence
 Since November 3, 2007 pursuant to some verbal, and unspecified, order passed by General Musharraf.
 
I have found it necessary to write to you, and others, because during
 His recent visits to Brussels, Paris, Davos and London General Musharraf has slandered me, and my colleagues, with impunity in press conferences and other addresses and meetings. In addition he has widely distributed, among those whom he has met, a slanderous document (hereinafter the Document)
entitled: "PROFILE OF THE FORMER CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN". I might
 have
let this go unresponded but the Document, unfortunately, is such an
 outrage that, with respect, it is surprising that a person claiming to be head of state should fall to such depths as to circulate such calumny against the Chief Justice of his own country.
 
In view of these circumstances I have no option but to join issue with
General Musharraf and to put the record straight. Since he has voiced
 His views on several public occasions so as to reach out to the public at large, I also am constrained to address your excellencies in an Open Letter to rebut the allegations against me.
 
At the outset you may be wondering why I have used the words "claiming
 to be
the head of state". That is quite deliberate. General Musharraf's
constitutional term ended on November 15, 2007. His claim to a further
 term
thereafter is the subject of active controversy before the Supreme
 Court of
Pakistan. It was while this claim was under adjudication before a Bench
 of
eleven learned judges of the Supreme Court that the General arrested a
majority of those judges in addition to me on November 3, 2007. He thus
himself subverted the judicial process which remains frozen at that
 point.
Besides arresting the Chief Justice and judges (can there have been a
greater outrage?) he also purported to suspend the Constitution and to
 purge
the entire judiciary (even the High Courts) of all independent judges.
 Now
only his hand-picked and compliant judges remain willing to "validate"
whatever he demands. And all this is also contrary to an express and
 earlier
order passed by the Supreme Court on November 3, 2007.
 
Meantime I and my colleagues remain in illegal detention. With me are
 also
detained my wife and three of my young children, all school-going and
 one a
special child. Such are the conditions of our detention that we cannot
 even
step  out on to the lawn for the winter sun because that space is
 occupied
by police pickets. Barbed wire barricades surround the residence and
 all
phone lines are cut. Even the water connection to my residence has been
periodically turned off. I am being persuaded to resign and to forego
 my
office, which is what I am not prepared to do.
 
I request you to seek first hand information of the barricades and of
 my
detention, as that of my children, from your Ambassador/High
Commissioner/representative in Pakistan. You will get a report of such
circumstances as have never prevailed even in medieval times. And these
 are
conditions put in place, in the twenty-first century, by a Government
 that
you support.
 
Needless to say that the Constitution of Pakistan contains no provision
 for
its suspension, and certainly not by the Chief of Army Staff. Nor can
 it be
amended except in accordance with Articles 238 and 239 which is by
Parliament and not an executive or military order. As such all actions
 taken
by General Musharraf on and after November 3 are illegal and ultra
 vires the
Constitution. That is why it is no illusion when I describe myself as
 the
Chief Justice even though I am physically and forcibly incapacitated by
 the
state apparatus under the command of the General. I am confident that
 as a
consequence of the brave and unrelenting struggle continued by the
 lawyers
and the civil society, the Constitution will prevail.
 
However, in the meantime, General Musharraf has launched upon a
 vigourous
initiative to defame and slander me. Failing to obtain my willing
 abdication
he has become desperate. The eight-page Document is the latest in this
feverish drive.
 
Before I take up the Document itself let me recall that the General
 first
ousted me from the Supreme Court on March 9 last year while filing an
indictment (in the form of a Reference under Article 209 of the
Constitution) against me. According to the General the Reference had
 been
prepared after a thorough investigation and comprehensively contained
 all
the charges against me. I had challenged that Reference and my ouster
 before
the Supreme Court. On July 20 a thirteen member Bench unanimously
 struck
down the action of the General as illegal and unconstitutional. I was
honourably reinstated.
 
*The Reference was thus wholly shattered and all the charges contained
therein trashed.* These cannot now be regurgitated except in contempt
 of the
Supreme Court. Any way, since the Document has been circulated by no
 less a
person than him I am constrained to submit the following for your kind
consideration in rebuttal thereof:
 
*The Document* is divided into several heads but the allegations
 contained
in it *can essentially be divided into two categories*: those
 allegations
that were contained in the Reference and those that were not.
 
Quite obviously, those that are a repeat from the Reference hold no
 water as
these have already been held by the Supreme Court to not be worth the
 ink
they were written in. In fact, the Supreme Court found that the
 evidence
submitted against me by the Government was so obviously fabricated and
incorrect, that the bench took the unprecedented step of fining the
Government Rs. 100,000 (a relatively small amount in dollar terms, but
 an
unheard of sum with respect to Court Sanction in Pakistan) for filing
clearly false and malicious documents, as well as revoking the license
 to
practice of the Advocate on Record for filing false documents. Indeed,
 faced
with the prospect of having filed clearly falsified documents against
 me,
the Government's attorneys, including the Attorney General, took a most
dishonorable but telling approach. Each one, in turn, stood before the
Supreme Court and disowned the Government's Reference, and stated they
 had
not reviewed the evidence against me before filing it with Court. They
 then
filed a formal request to the Court to withdraw the purported evidence,
 and
tendered an unconditional apology for filing such a scandalous and
 false
documents. So baseless and egregious were the claims made by General
Musharraf that on July 20th, 2007, the full Supreme Court for the first
 time
in Pakistan's history, ruled unanimously against a sitting military
 ruler
and reinstated me honorably to my post.
 
Despite having faced these charges in open court, must I now be
 slandered
with those same charges by General Musharraf in world capitals, while I
remain a prisoner and unable to speak in my defense?
 
 
 
There are, of course, a second set of charges. These were not contained
 in
the Reference and are now being bandied around by the General at every
opportunity.
 
I forcefully and vigorously deny every single one of them. The truth of
these "new" allegations can be judged from the fact that they all
 ostensibly
date to the period before the reference was filed against me last
 March, yet
none of them was listed in the already bogus charge sheet.
 
If there were any truth to these manufactured charges, the Government
 should
have included them in the reference against me. God knows they threw in
everything including the kitchen sink into that scurrilous 450 page
document, only to have it thrown out by the entire Supreme Court after
 a 3
month open trial.
 
The charges against me are so transparently baseless that General
Musharraf's regime has banned the discussion of my situation and the
 charges
in the broadcast media. This is because the ridiculous and flimsy
 nature of
the charges is self-evident whenever an opportunity is provided to
 actually
refute them.
 
Instead, the General only likes to recite his libel list from a rostrum
 or
in gathering where there is no opportunity for anyone to respond.
Incidentally, the General maligns me in the worst possible way at every
opportunity. That is the basis for the Document he has distributed. But
 he
has not just deposed me from the Judiciary. He has also fired more than
 half
of the Superior Judiciary of Pakistan – nearly 50 judges in all --
 together
with me. They have also been arrested and detained.
 
What are the charges against them? Why should they be fired and
 arrested if
I am the corrupt judge?  Moreover even my attorneys Aitzaz Ahsan,
  Munir
Malik, Tariq Mahmood and Ali Ahmed Kurd were also arrested on November
 3.
Malik alone has been released but only because both his kidneys
 collapsed as
a result of prison torture
 
Finally, as to the Document, it also contains some further allegations
described as *"Post-Reference Conduct"* that is attributed to me under
various heads. This would mean only those allegedly 'illegal' actions
claimed to have been taken by me *after* March 9, 2007. These are under
 the
heads given below and replied to as under:
 
   1. *"Participation in SJC (Supreme Judicial Council) Proceedings": *
 
*(a) Retaining 'political lawyers': Aitzaz Ahsan and Zammurrad Khan:*
 
It is alleged that I gave a political colour to my defence by engaging
political lawyers Aitzaz Ahsan and Zamurrad Khan both Pakistan Peoples'
Party Members of the National Assembly. The answer is simple.
 
I sought to engage the best legal team in the country. Mr. Ahsan is of
course an MNA (MP), but he is also the top lawyer in Pakistan. For that
reference may be made simply to the ranking of Chambers and Partners
 Global.
Such is his respect in Pakistan's legal landscape that he was elected
President of the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan by one of
 the
widest margins in the Association's history.
 
All high profile personalities have placed their trust in his talents.
 He
has thus been the attorney for Prime Ministers Bhutto and Sharif, (even
though he was an opponent of the latter) Presidential candidate
 (against
Musharraf) Justice Wajihuddin, sports star and politician Imran Khan,
 former
Speakers, Ministers, Governors, victims of political vendetta, and also
 the
internationally acclaimed gang-rape victim Mukhtar Mai, to mention only
 a
few.
 
Equally important, Barrister Ahsan is a man of integrity who is known
 to
withstand all pressures and enticements. That is a crucial factor in
 enaging
an attorney when one's prosecutor is the sitting military ruler, with
enourmous monetary and coercive resources at his disposal.
 
Mr. Zamurrad Khan is also a recognized professional lawyer, a former
Secretary of the District Bar Rawalpindi, and was retained by Mr.
 Aitzaz
Ahsan to assist him in the case. Mr. Khan has been a leading light of
 the
Lawyers' Movement for the restoration of the deposed judiciary and has
bravely faced all threats and vilification.
 
Finally, surely I am entitled to my choice of lawyers and not that of
 the
General.
 
 
 
*(b) "Riding in Mr. Zafarullah Jamali (former Prime Minister)'s car":*
 
How much the Document tries to deceive is apparent from the allegation
 that
I willingly rode in Mr. Jamali's car for the first hearing of the case
against me on March 13 (as if that alone is an offence). Actually the
Government should have been ashamed of itself for creating the
 circumstances
that forced me to take that ride.
 
Having been stripped of official transport on the 9th March (my
 vehicles
were removed from my house by the use of fork lifters), I decided to
 walk
the one-mile to the Supreme Court. Along the way I was molested and
manhandled, my hair was pulled and neck craned in the full blaze of the
media, by a posse of policemen under the supervision of the Inspector
General of Police. (A judicial inquiry, while I was still deposed,
established this fact). In order to escape the physical assault I took
refuge with Mr. Jamali and went the rest of the journey on his car.
 Instead
of taking action against the police officials for manhandling the Chief
Justice it is complained that I was on the wrong!
 
*(c) "Creating a political atmosphere":*
 
Never did I instigate or invite any "political atmosphere". I never
addressed the press or any political rally. I kept my lips sealed even
 under
extreme provocation from the General and his ministers who were
 reviling me
on a daily basis. I maintained a strict judicial silence. I petitioned
 the
Supreme Court and won. That was my vindication.
 
   1. *"Country wide touring and Politicising the Issue":*
 
The Constitution guarantees to all citizens free movement throughout
Pakistan. How can this then be a complaint?
 
By orders dated March 9 and 15 (both of which were found to be without
lawful authority by the Court) I had been sent of "forced leave". I
 could
neither perform any judicial or administrative functions as the Chief
Justice of Pakistan. I was prevented not only from sitting in court but
 also
from access to my own chamber by the force of arms under orders of the
General. (All my papers were removed, even private documents).
 
The only function as 'a judge on forced leave' that I could perform was
 to
address and deliver lectures to various Bar Associations. I accepted
 their
invitations. They are peppered all over Pakistan. I had to drive to
 these
towns as all these are not linked by air. On the way the people of
 Pakistan
did, indeed, turn out in  their millions, often waiting from dawn to
 dusk or
from dusk to dawn, to greet me. But I never addressed them even when
 they
insisted that I do. I never spoke to the press. I sat quietly in my
 vehicle
without uttering a word. All this is on the record as most journeys
 were
covered by the media live and throughout.
 
I spoke only to deliver lectures on professional and constitutional
 issues
to the Bar Associations. Transcripts of every single one of my
 addresses are
available. Every single word uttered by me in those addresses conforms
 to
the stature, conduct and non-political nature of the office of the
 Chief
Justice. There was no politics in these whatsoever. I did not even
 mention
my present status or the controversy or the proceedings before the
 Council
or the Court, not even the Reference. Not even once.
 
All the persons named in the Document under this head are lawyers and
 were
members of the reception committees in various towns and Bar
 Associations.
 
   1. *Political Leaders Calling on CJP residence:*
 
It is alleged that I received political leaders while I was deposed. It
 is
on the record of the Supreme Judicial Council itself that I was
 detained
after being deposed on March 9. The only persons allowed to meet me
 were
those cleared by the Government. One was a senior political leader.
 None
else was allowed to see me, initially not even my lawyers. How can I be
blamed for whomsoever comes to my residence?
 
Had I wanted to politicize the issue I would have gone to the Press or
invited the media. I did not. I had recourse to the judicial process
 for my
reinstatement and won. The General lost miserably in a fair and
 straight
contest. That is my only fault.
 
   1. *"Conclusion":*
 
Hence the conclusion drawn by the General that charges had been proved
against me 'beyond doubt' is absolutely contrary to the facts and wide
 off
the mark. It is a self-serving justification of the eminently illegal
 action
*of firing and arresting judges of superior courts* under the garb of
 an
Emergency (read Martial Law) when the Constitution was 'suspended' and
 then
'restored' later with drastic and illegal 'amendments' grafted into it.
 
The Constitution cannot be amended except by the two Houses of
 Parliament
and by a two-thirds majority in each House. That is the letter of the
 law.
How can one man presume or arrogate to himself that power?
 
Unfortunately the General is grievously economical with the truth (I
 refrain
from using the word 'lies') when he says that the charges against me
 were
'investigated and verified beyond doubt'. As explained above, these had
 in
fact been rubbished by the Full Court Bench of the Supreme Court of
 Pakistan
against which judgment the government filed no application for review.
 
 
 
What the General has done has serious implications for Pakistan and the
world. In squashing the judiciary for his own personal advantage and
 nothing
else he has usurped the space of civil and civilized society. If
 civilized
norms of justice will not be allowed to operate then that space will,
inevitably, be occupied by those who believe in more brutal and instant
justice: the extremists in the wings. Those are the very elements the
 world
seems to be pitted against. Those are the very elements the actions of
 the
General are making way for.
 
Some western governments are emphasizing the unfolding of the
 democratic
process in Pakistan. That is welcome, if it will be fair. But, and in
 any
case, can there be democracy if there is no independent judiciary?
 
Remember, independent judges and judicial processes preceded full
 franchise
by several hundred years. Moreover, which judge in Pakistan today can
 be
independent who has before his eyes the fate and example of his own
 Chief
Justice: detained for three months along with his young children. What
 is
the children's crime, after all?
 
There can be no democracy without an independent judiciary, and there
 can be
no independent judge in Pakistan until the action of November 3 is
 reversed.
Whatever the will of some desperate men the struggle of the valiant
 lawyers
and civil society of Pakistan will bear fruit. They are not giving up.
 
Let me also assure you that I would not have written this letter
 without the
General's unbecoming onslaught. That has compelled me to clarify
 although,
as my past will testify, I am not given into entering into public, even
private, disputes. But the allegations against me have been so wild, so
wrong and so contrary to judicial record, that I have been left with no
option but to put the record straight. After all, a prisoner must also
 have his say. And if the General's hand-picked judges, some living next door to my prison home, have not had the courage to invoke the power of 'habeas corpus' these last three months, what other option do I have? Many leaders of the world and the media may choose to brush the situation under the carpet out of love of the General. But that will not be.
 
Nevertheless, let me also reassure you that I continue in my resolve
 not to preside any Bench which will be seized of matters pertaining to the personal interests of General Musharraf after the restoration of the Constitution and the judges, which, God willing, will be soon.
 
Finally, I leave you with the question: Is there a precedent in
 history, all history, of 60 judges, including three Chief Justices (of the Supreme Court and two of Pakistan's four High Courts), being dismissed, arrested and detained at the whim of one man? I have failed to discover any such even in medieval times under any emperor, king, or sultan, or even when a dictator has had full military sway over any country in more recent times. But this incredible outrage has happened in the 21st century at the hands of an extremist General out on a 'charm offensive' of western capitals and one whom the west supports.
 
I am grateful for your attention. I have no other purpose than to clear
 My name and to save the country (and perhaps others as well) from the
 calamity that stares us in the face. We can still rescue it from all kinds of extremism: praetorian and dogmatic. After all, the edifice of an  independent judicial system alone stands  on the middle ground between these two  extremes. If the edifice is destroyed by the one, the ground may be taken over by the other. That is what is happening in Pakistan. Practitioners of rough and brutal justice will be welcomed in spaces from where the practitioners of more refined norms of justice and balance have been made to abdicate.
 
I have enormous faith that the Constitution and justice will soon
 prevail.
 
Yours truly,
 
 
 
 
 
Iftikhar Mohammad Choudhry,
 
Chief Justice of Pakistan,
 
Presently:
 
imprisoned in the Chief Justice's House,
 
Islamabad.

 

About these ads
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers

%d bloggers like this: